Wow, I'm loving the underwater sea life. Is that a bird, I see? I find it interesting how the birds (if that's what they are) are underwater and the sting rays look as if they're flying away when they should actually be in the water. That star fish is really something. I've only seen the regular looking ones not the ultra skinny ones.
Overall, good job with blending all the images together and adjusting the lighting on the different levels of water.
I love the depth and the use of so many things but you need to make sure you follow the project outlines and incorporate images that you and your classmates scanned.
I am interested in how you reflected the images in the water by flipping them. What if this happened in reverse? For instance, some object underwater is clear when submerged, but there is a distorted reflection on the surface of the water...
Margo makes a good point, mainly because I think being forced to incorporate some of the scans will get you out of being stuck, as you expressed last class, and may lead to some unexpected meanings. (or if you already have done this, try making the juxtapositions more obscure)
Finally, I hate to say it, but now that you have filled the middle ground, I am missing the small items in the distance.
Beyond these adjustments, I think this image is interesting for the viewer to travel through.
Wow, I'm loving the underwater sea life. Is that a bird, I see? I find it interesting how the birds (if that's what they are) are underwater and the sting rays look as if they're flying away when they should actually be in the water. That star fish is really something. I've only seen the regular looking ones not the ultra skinny ones.
ReplyDeleteOverall, good job with blending all the images together and adjusting the lighting on the different levels of water.
I love the depth and the use of so many things but you need to make sure you follow the project outlines and incorporate images that you and your classmates scanned.
ReplyDeleteI am interested in how you reflected the images in the water by flipping them. What if this happened in reverse? For instance, some object underwater is clear when submerged, but there is a distorted reflection on the surface of the water...
ReplyDeleteMargo makes a good point, mainly because I think being forced to incorporate some of the scans will get you out of being stuck, as you expressed last class, and may lead to some unexpected meanings. (or if you already have done this, try making the juxtapositions more obscure)
Finally, I hate to say it, but now that you have filled the middle ground, I am missing the small items in the distance.
Beyond these adjustments, I think this image is interesting for the viewer to travel through.
I ABSOLUTELY LOVE YOUR PROJECT. IT IS SO BACKWARD AND LOOKS REAL AT THE SAME TIME!
ReplyDelete